hile making arrangements for the Pangolin
Meetings and considering what type of laser to use, both
AVI and
Lighting Systems Designed offered the use of their new solid state,
white-light lasers. We decided to accept the offer of both companies
and it turned out to be an excellent choice for many reasons.
The first Pangolin Meeting was held in a
meeting room at the Radisson Twin Towers. For this meeting, we used
the Microcolor prototype laser from
Lighting Systems Design. This
laser delivered nearly 2 watts of white light, through two separate
fibers. It was extremely convenient since the only utility needed
was a 120V AC outlet. The laser is air cooled, but the fans are
extremely quiet.
Schneider Showlaser,
provided by AVI
The second Pangolin Meeting was held at the
offices of AVI. For this meeting, we used the Schneider Showlaser.
As mentioned before, the Schneider Showlaser produces over 10 watts
of white light through a single fiber. It runs off of a 220 volt AC
outlet.
There are some similarities and differences
between the lasers. As far as similarities, both lasers are
completely self-contained and solid state. Both lasers consume very
little power from essentially standard power outlets. Both lasers
are relatively expensive and both lasers produce absolutely stunning
colors.
Differences between
the two lasers
As far as the differences, some are pretty
major and others are pretty subtle. The first major difference is
the cost. The Schneider costs about as much as three large frame ion
lasers, while the Microcolor is slated to cost around 1.5 times as
much as a small frame ion laser. The second major difference is the
weight. The Schneider weighs around 660 pounds while the Microcolor
weighs only around 40 pounds. The Schneider laser is pulsed at 84MHz
with 6ps pulses while the Microcolor is a continuous wave laser,
just like an ion laser. The Schneider is a shipping product, while
the Microcolor is still a prototype.
There
is a subtle difference
in the colors produced
by each laser. Before getting into the specifics, let me make it
very clear that both lasers produce absolutely stunning colors. The
colors are so vibrant that they really do re-invigorate the
experience of watching laser shows. For many attendees, it was like
being bit by the laser bug all over again.
The blue wavelength of the Schneider laser is
446nm. If you look at the CIE Chromaticity
Diagram, you will notice that this wavelength is
almost within the purple region of human vision. This
provides very strong and saturated purples and deep blues, but
interestingly enough, since the wavelength is so much toward purple,
you actually have to add some green to it just to make Royal Blue.
Because of this, and because of the green
wavelength relative to the blue wavelength, this makes the blue-green, cyan, and light blue colors
not as saturated as theoretically possible with
an Argon/Krypton
laser, or the Microcolor laser.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bb41/3bb4197e51cbfe195ce9b80d28d644e4ceea762d" alt=""
The blue wavelength of the Microcolor laser is
457nm. This is the same as the deep blue wavelength of an Argon
laser. Although this is only 11nm from the blue wavelength of the
Schneider laser, and although you still get very strong and
saturated purples and deep blues, you dont have to mix
nearly as much green with
this wavelength to make a Royal Blue. As a result, the blue-green,
cyan and light blue colors produced are slightly more saturated than
the Schneider laser, but still not as saturated
as theoretically possible with an Argon/Krypton laser.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f27/92f275bb95b961d3bcfa2fd459587b68f13eee03" alt=""
Although the subtle difference does result in
somewhat different colors produced by each laser, the viewing experience of
both the Schneider and Microcolor lasers has a similar level of excitement. As
I said, it is like being bit by the laser bug all over again.
Why is the white
"whiter" with solid-state lasers?
In the center of the CIE Chromaticity Diagram,
you will see the color white. Take note of the straight line between
the Green and Blue wavelengths of the solid-state lasers. This line
passes very close to white. Because of this, you really don't have
to work very hard to make a nice white. Just add a little bit of
red, and you're there.
An Argon Krypton laser has at least six
relatively strong wavelengths. If these wavelengths are modulated
with LD2000's ability to control each wavelength separately, you can
see that this might result in the most-saturated
blue-green, cyan, and light blue colors. Taking a
look at the CIE Chromaticity Diagram for an Argon/Krypton laser, you
can see just where each wavelength lands and how saturated the
colors are.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31d63/31d6350c42f814675ef98b377605e5164340eeb8" alt=""
Why do
the colors seem more saturated with solid-state lasers?
If you look at the CIE Chromaticity Diagrams
above for all three lasers, it certainly looks like the
Argon/Krypton laser should have more saturated colors. But most
often, this does not appear to be the case. The reason has more to
do with power than wavelengths.
For an Argon/Krypton laser, sure
there are more wavelengths and sure, the wavelengths are positioned
such that they promote the largest color gamut. However, the power
level in the deepest blue wavelengths is far less than other
wavelengths. A modified CIE diagram appears below where the power
level of each wavelength is taken into account. Here you can see
that the deep blue wavelengths just can't produce the same vibrant
colors as a solid-state laser.
Since solid-state lasers only have
one blue wavelength, they are in a sense "optimized" to deliver a
strong enough blue to complement the green and red power levels.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c218/2c218985adbac756d1e2f86778bed3b51aaffcec" alt=""
|